Blog / News

The Persuasion Edge for Legal Communication workshop

On Friday November 11th, 2011, David Farnbauch will be attending Eric Oliver’s legal communication workshop “The Persuasion Edge for Legal Communication” in Washington D.C. 

Eric G Oliver is one of the premier Trial/Jury consultants in the United States. Eric has concentrated in nonverbal, verbal, and implicit communication skills for over 27 years—23 working with attorneys. Besides teaching effective communication skills to attorneys and their firms, he spends most of his time helping trial attorneys prepare and present more receiver-friendly cases in court and for settlement presentations and discussions. He helps lawyers build a presentation plan for each case—adaptable to any venue—integrating the verbal, visual, and personal parts of the trial based on jurors needs and expectations uncovered in focus groups and voir dire. 

Eric Oliver is coauthor of “Courtroom Power: Communication Strategies for Trial Lawyers”, and author of “Facts Can’t Speak for Themselves: Reveal the Stories that Give Facts their Meaning” and “Persuasive Communication”. Eric is also the founder of the consulting firm, MetaSystems, Ltd., located in Canton, Michigan.

Topics the legal communication workshop will concentrate on:

Rapport and Mirroring

Attendees will discover how to take their natural talent for making strong, sometimes immediate connections from personal settings to the professional arena. They will learn how to take a listener from a position of suspicion or disinterest to at least attentive, if not fully engaged, without changing anything you would have said—or not said.

Case Story Sequence

If every story has three main steps, and every story is different, and “duty-breach-harm-damage” or “and then-and then-and then chronology” are not the most persuasive order in which to deliver proofs, then what is the best sequence to present the case story? Attendees will learn how much has to happen before the “bad acts” drop in.

Sense Systems and Case Stories

What is the most basic bias affecting every decision maker as they construct their own personal version of the case story?  Use the Sensory System preferences to increase influence in the case story delivery.  Attendees will learn the bias towards a visual, oral, or feeling preference for the building blocks of perception to make meaning of any case story.  Attendees will discover how to confirm their own sensory preference—visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, and how to detect anyone else’s in short order. Finally, attendees will learn the mechanics of a purely visual delivery of any case story point.

Anchors, Frames, and Themes

Attendees will learn to frame the delivery of key parts of client’s case stories to not only present them well or even to overcome a weakness, but also turn certain weaknesses into strengths, using key phrases and images (anchors) already available.

Posted in:

Related Posts

Webinar - Shifting Paradigms: Speed Trial and Damages

Shifting Paradigms: Speed Trial and Damages - A Webinar with Joe Fried 3 Hours CLE/ Distance Education Program Chair: David Farnbauch, Sweeney Law Firm October 28th 9:00 am - 12:00 pm ET Online Seminar Agenda Speed Trial: Our present paradigm Why does it take so long to try a case to a jury? Is there a correlation between the length of a trial and the verdict amount? How do fear and limiting beliefs play into our trial strategy and presentation? Is there a good reason to explore other paradigms? What if we could work from a new paradigm Identify what the case needs to be about and what we need to prove to win Get to the point(s) quickly with less fluff Present fewer witnesses Present fewer points Could this work? Examples of cases How the new paradigm works in practice: Discussion about identifying what the case needs to be about Discussion about identifying the few critical points for a case Discussion about editing facts, limiting the number of issues and number of witnesses Discussion about editing content for each witness How to make it easy for jurors to get the point Outlines for specific types of witnesses Liability witness (police officer, eye-witness, expert) Medical Summary Witness Doctor Life Care Planner Economist Before and after witness Client Jury Selection Opening Statement Talking About Damages: What is your current damages paradigm Where did it originate? What limiting beliefs control you? Are those limiting beliefs true? Who gets to decide what a case is worth? What is the damages story in your case? Injury cases Death cases Best uses of jury charges to aid in damages presentation Understanding why talking about money is so difficult How do you know the number is the right number to ask for? New ways to talk about money Economic damages: Drop them or not? Anchoring Talking about money in jury selection, opening, witnesses and closing Using surrogates at trial Other general food for thought Joe Fried is regarded as one of the top truck crash lawyers in the country today. His passion for what he does is palpable, and his reputation speaks for itself. In addition to being one of the cop attorneys in the nation. Joe is a recognized highway safety advocate and educational leader, sharing his knowledge with other lawyers on how to maximize results in trucking litigation. He has litigated cases in more than 30 states with record results and has given over 300 presentations to lawyer, judge, and police audiences on trucking and trial-related topics.

WANE 15 News Discusses a new nursing home ruling with David Farnbauch

WANE 15 News discusses a new nursing home ruling in Indiana, with David Farnbauch, Managing Partner at Sweeney Law Firm in Fort Wayne. Read here for the full article.

Farnbauch quoted by BuzzFeed News regarding the Hammersley Litigation

David Farnbauch was recently quoted by Buzzfeed News in an article detailing the VA medical malpractice cases involving Dr. Bradley Hammersley. Sweeney Law Firm is currently representing 33 of the cases being brought against Dr. Hammersley. Read the Buzzfeed News article here.