Blog / Medical Malpractice

Informed Consent for Medical Procedures in Indiana

Medical malpractice lawyer David Farnbauch discusses informed consent and how medical providers need to give you all the pertinent information regarding the medical procedures they will be performing on you.

Informed consent in Indiana is something that is required in the medical field before a physician or a healthcare provider is allowed to operate or do anything to a patient.

If your having some kind of risky surgery, The doctors need to sit down with you and explain to you what is involved with the medical procedure.

Do You Have a Medical Malpractice Case? We will consult with board certified physicians and review the merits of your medical malpractice claim for free.   

Remember there is never a fee, unless we make a recovery for you.

Posted in:

Related Posts

$1.167 million settlement for failure to monitor an epidural drain

$1.167 million settlement for medical malpractice for a hospital’s negligent failure to monitor an epidural drain following lumbar surgery. The plaintiff sustained permanent nerve damage that severely impacted the function of his lower extremities and caused a chronic pain syndrome.

INsight | Medical Malpractice Claims for Active Military Personnel

On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed the National Defense Authorization Act into law. The legislation was inspired by husband, father, and Army Sgt. First Class Richard Stayskal. For months, Stayskal had struggled with severe breathing issues. He decided to get help at the Womack Army Medical Center in North Carolina, but was told it was just a mild case of pneumonia. Unfortunately, he actually had stage four terminal lung cancer. Their misdiagnosis allowed his tumor to nearly double in size and spread to several different organs. Learn more about his story.

$1,180,000 settlement against ophthalmology clinic

$1,180,000 settlement in a medical malpractice case against an ophthalmology clinic for negligence in connection with post-operative care of a corneal implant. The plaintiff eventually lost the vast majority of her eyesight in one eye as a result of the clinic’s negligent care.